Add to ORKGAbstract. A mistake swapped process rates between auto-conversion and accretion in global model solutions. Revised figures are presented. The accretion to autoconversion ratio in the model does increase with Liquid Water Path (LWP) as in the steady state model but biases remain. Simulated auto-conversion rates are too high. Adjusting process rates follow-ing the steady state model ideas leads to an improvement in process rates. The main conclusion is unaffected.
Equilibrium climate sensitivity to a doubling of CO2 falls between 2.0 and 4.6 K in current climate ...
The purpose of this paper is to draw attention to the need for appropriate numerical techniques to ...
In Table 2 of Elsbury et al. (2019), titled "The atmospheric response to positive IPV, positive AMV,...
In the simulations for the paper “Influence of Giant CCN on warm rain processes in the ECHAM5 GCM ” ...
An investigation of the impact of the subgrid-scale variability of cloud liquid water on the autocon...
A grid box in a numerical model that ignores subgrid variability has biases in certain microphysical...
In a recent paper, Liu and Daum (2004, hereafter LD04) derive analytical expressions for the rate of...
We have identified several errors in the calculations that were performed to create Fig. 3 of Del Ge...
The simulations with economic uncertainty discussed in section 4b of Sokolov et al. (2009) were, by...
© 2017 American Meteorological Society. Two errors have been identified in the code used in the work...
An error in the calculation of the emitted number of primary sulfate particles for a given mass of e...
The authors regret that there was an error in formula (19), which was not detected by us in the fina...
State-of-the-art coupled general circulation models (CGCMs) have substantial errors in their simulat...
Aerosols are known to significantly affect cloud and precipitation patterns and intensity, but these...
International audienceUnfortunately, in the aforementioned contribution, Fig. 5 (Monthly multi-model...
Equilibrium climate sensitivity to a doubling of CO2 falls between 2.0 and 4.6 K in current climate ...
The purpose of this paper is to draw attention to the need for appropriate numerical techniques to ...
In Table 2 of Elsbury et al. (2019), titled "The atmospheric response to positive IPV, positive AMV,...
In the simulations for the paper “Influence of Giant CCN on warm rain processes in the ECHAM5 GCM ” ...
An investigation of the impact of the subgrid-scale variability of cloud liquid water on the autocon...
A grid box in a numerical model that ignores subgrid variability has biases in certain microphysical...
In a recent paper, Liu and Daum (2004, hereafter LD04) derive analytical expressions for the rate of...
We have identified several errors in the calculations that were performed to create Fig. 3 of Del Ge...
The simulations with economic uncertainty discussed in section 4b of Sokolov et al. (2009) were, by...
© 2017 American Meteorological Society. Two errors have been identified in the code used in the work...
An error in the calculation of the emitted number of primary sulfate particles for a given mass of e...
The authors regret that there was an error in formula (19), which was not detected by us in the fina...
State-of-the-art coupled general circulation models (CGCMs) have substantial errors in their simulat...
Aerosols are known to significantly affect cloud and precipitation patterns and intensity, but these...
International audienceUnfortunately, in the aforementioned contribution, Fig. 5 (Monthly multi-model...
Equilibrium climate sensitivity to a doubling of CO2 falls between 2.0 and 4.6 K in current climate ...
The purpose of this paper is to draw attention to the need for appropriate numerical techniques to ...
In Table 2 of Elsbury et al. (2019), titled "The atmospheric response to positive IPV, positive AMV,...